Provisional account preservation measures in European civil procedure law




Details zur Publikation

Untertitel: a comparison between Brussels Ia and the Regulation on the European Account Preservation Order from an Austrian and a Slovenian perspective
Autorenliste: Anzenberger P, Ivanc T
Verlag: Austrian Law Journal / Brigitte Lurger, Elisabeth Staudegger, Stefan Storr
Jahr der Veröffentlichung: 2017
Zeitschrift: Austrian Law Journal (2409-6911)
Heftnummer: 2
Erste Seite: 57
Letzte Seite: 70
Seitenumfang: 14
ISSN: 2409-6911
Sprachen: Englisch-Vereinigtes Königreich (EN-GB)


With the Regulations 1215/2012 (Brussels Ia Regulation) and 655/2014 (EAPO Regulation),
the European legislator has created two new and very distinct instruments to facilitate cross-border
debt recovery in civil and commercial matters. While the Brussels Ia Regulation provides for an easier
recognition and enforcement of national interim measures in other EU Member States, the EAPO
Regulation creates a single provisional and protective measure enabling creditors to prevent the
transfer or withdrawal of the debtors' assets from any bank account located in the EU.
This paper provides a comparative analysis of these European legal instruments by evaluating the
rules on preconditions, legal remedies and the different effects of national interim measures that
shall be recognised and enforced within the Brussels Ia regime and the new EAPO.


Es wurden keine entsprechenden Inhalte gefunden.


Es wurden keine entsprechenden Inhalte gefunden.

Zuletzt aktualisiert 2019-10-08 um 00:16